Talk:Orb sandbox

Comments on Orb sandbox -

ChrisRing said ...
What is the intent of this page? The wiki isn't intended to be a general scratchpad.

--ChrisRing 11:30, 19 January 2012 (CST)

Orbarron said ...
looking for a way to rearrange some information. Using this as a base for some ideas I'm working on. Would like to propose some new ideas but need a sand box in order to give some examples.

--Orbarron 00:00, 28 January 2012 (CST)

TommyG said ...
Question about whether silicon or software should be first thing customer sees. I'm used to thinking about silicon first (peripherals/performance). But I'm old school, so maybe different emphasis today. Though it seems like HW guys make the initial decisions.

I'd also like to see some details on supported end equipments and how they are supported.

--TommyG 10:27, 6 March 2012 (CST)

Ltjr said ...
So is the conecpt that there should be a page like this for each product? Also I notice there is no WinCE, I know its no longer supported by TI but shouldn't it still be mentioned?

--Ltjr 10:59, 6 March 2012 (CST)

Gonzalesti said ...
ok, so assuming we are creating one of these per device, I would like to see 3Ps (with their areas of expertise) and reference designs (TIs and 3Ps) other than official EVMs listed.

--Gonzalesti 11:39, 6 March 2012 (CST)

Gonzalesti said ...
Also, you may want to take a look at the previous attempt at reorganizing content which was well received by the field (I was involved on the multiple call sessions which lead up to this). Many good ideas here http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Category:C6-Integra

--Gonzalesti 11:45, 6 March 2012 (CST)

DanRinkes said ...
The better place for this would be on your User page, not in the Main namespace.

--Dan Rinkes 08:40, 19 June 2012 (CDT)